Online conference: the differences
Rather than heading to Vienna as I did last year for the General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union, I attended its online replacement this year: Sharing Geoscience Online (#shareEGU20).
As everyone knows, online meetings should happen more often because it's better for the climate and because we do have the technology nowadays to make it happen easily. While some (including scientists) have already been taking advantage of this possibility for a while, the current pandemic is forcing almost everyone else to do the same.As most people, I happen to have been on video calls with a few people to discuss results from my research or plan upcoming measurement campaigns. However, I don't recall participating ever in an online conference before last week.
I thought that I would make a short (and extremely subjective) comparison between the in-person and the online versions of the EGU General Assembly. Let me know in the comments about your own experience with this conference or any other conference that moved online.
EGU General Assembly 2019 (in person) |
Share Geoscience Online 2020 (online conference) |
|
---|---|---|
Travel time | ca. 2.5-hour flight from Helsinki to Vienna | < 1 minute from bedroom to kitchen |
Carbon footprint | offset on site | negligible |
Cost | ca. 2000 EUR (fees, travel, accommodation, etc.) |
35 EUR (abstract submission fee) |
Early start | 8h30 | one hour later |
End of the day | late | earlier |
Coffee | whenever available | sometimes (lot of tea otherwise) |
Merch/Goodies | some | none |
Technical struggles | it happens | it happens |
Small talk | lots | none |
Unexpected/unplanned encounters | yes | no |
Lunch/Dinner with colleagues and friends | frequent | never |
Weather | pleasant Viennese spring | irrelevant |
Outfit | formal (presentation day) to casual (other days) | very casual |
Schnitzel | 2 | 0 |
Feeling of being overwhelmed | yes | somewhat |
Comments
Post a Comment